Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-29 04:44:11 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

There exists a colorable legal argument that time limits on ratification are, in fact, incompatible with the Constitution, and therefore the ERA can still be ratified. But even aside from that, this tweet makes no misleading claims either way. No note needed, debate in replies.

Written by 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1652171899881783296
• noteId - 1652171899881783296
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1682743451460
• tweetId - 1651632270292254720
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• There exists a colorable legal argument that time limits on ratification are, in fact, incompatible with the Constitution, and therefore the ERA can still be ratified. But even aside from that, this tweet makes no misleading claims either way. No note needed, debate in replies.