Birdwatch Note
2023-04-28 20:42:01 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Republicans did not support cuts in social security but some proposed a means test (high earner reduction) as well as a lesser increase. The latter being improperly framed as a reduction from D proposed budgets. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/03/changes-americans-are-willing-to-make-to-fix-social-security.html
Written by 452FD8A94C19A2D3D9438D1ABAC3BFDD9C93336DF9F941118B9563E66C0BC489
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1652049338950885404
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1652050559812218889
- noteId - 1652050559812218889
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 452FD8A94C19A2D3D9438D1ABAC3BFDD9C93336DF9F941118B9563E66C0BC489 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1682714521734
- tweetId - 1652049338950885404
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Republicans did not support cuts in social security but some proposed a means test (high earner reduction) as well as a lesser increase. The latter being improperly framed as a reduction from D proposed budgets. https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/03/changes-americans-are-willing-to-make-to-fix-social-security.html
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-04-28 20:42:01 UTC (1682714521734) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC (1683340944665) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-04-29 15:33:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:40:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:34:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:33:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:19:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:13:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:10:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 21:23:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:42:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:33:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:32:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:12:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:09:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:04:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:03:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:42:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:33:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:13:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:34:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:04:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-29 15:33:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:09:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:40:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:32:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:33:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 21:23:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:12:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:10:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 22:19:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-28 20:03:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-08-03 04:39:05 -0500 | Rating Details |