Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-27 23:45:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Tweet is just pointing out how ridiculous some of the proposed notes can be. Screenshot clearly says it’s suggested context and “Not shown on Twitter” so if someone does think it’s being displayed that’s not because the tweet author mislead them. Note not needed. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

Written by 72A59FB5955991E68C6349DA62C35A734500BE2AEFDA828D7BB704AB0E76465C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1651568787462795268

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1651734350923440128
  • noteId - 1651734350923440128
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 72A59FB5955991E68C6349DA62C35A734500BE2AEFDA828D7BB704AB0E76465C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1682639131656
  • tweetId - 1651568787462795268
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Tweet is just pointing out how ridiculous some of the proposed notes can be. Screenshot clearly says it’s suggested context and “Not shown on Twitter” so if someone does think it’s being displayed that’s not because the tweet author mislead them. Note not needed. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-27 23:45:31 UTC
(1682639131656)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-29 14:26:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 06:26:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 05:16:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 03:02:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:53:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:46:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:45:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:17:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:16:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 22:51:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 20:50:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 20:30:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 19:25:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 19:18:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 19:00:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 18:51:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 18:49:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 18:48:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:16:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 03:02:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:53:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 19:25:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:46:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:45:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 19:00:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 19:18:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 18:51:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:17:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 20:50:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 06:26:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-29 14:26:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 18:49:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 18:48:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 20:30:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 05:16:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 22:51:49 -0500 Rating Details