Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-27 13:11:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

No note is needed. The note above is (probably admittedly) just expressing personal animus toward Elon Musk. Chuck Schumer has publicly confirmed this meeting, telling reporters; "It was good." https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/elon-musk-meets-schumer-discuss-artificial-intelligence-rcna81696

Written by 2FE943915B079274764047ED341E772283E7C057DA5A3E0C4064DF4A72EC742C
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1651346839059275776

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1651574758692081665
  • noteId - 1651574758692081665
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2FE943915B079274764047ED341E772283E7C057DA5A3E0C4064DF4A72EC742C Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1682601081906
  • tweetId - 1651346839059275776
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • No note is needed. The note above is (probably admittedly) just expressing personal animus toward Elon Musk. Chuck Schumer has publicly confirmed this meeting, telling reporters; "It was good." https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/elon-musk-meets-schumer-discuss-artificial-intelligence-rcna81696

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-27 13:11:21 UTC
(1682601081906)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-29 02:32:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 03:14:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 02:30:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 01:05:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:38:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 22:58:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 17:11:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 17:06:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 16:14:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 11:45:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 10:00:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 08:14:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 12:49:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 09:32:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 13:56:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 02:30:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 01:05:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 11:45:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 17:06:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 10:00:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 08:14:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 12:49:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-28 03:14:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 23:38:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 22:58:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 09:32:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 13:56:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 16:14:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-29 02:32:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 17:11:44 -0500 Rating Details