Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-27 02:53:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The claim that "Not 1 CMA appeal has been successful" is false. One example of a successful appeal against the CMA is the case of Flynn Pharma Ltd and Pfizer V Competition and Markets Authority https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2020-0113.html

Written by 8487591E4463E8B3C6534E72CFE0A65EF3CB7E3D44909BE7BC836654952C5C3B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1651326093016588291

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1651419262286811138
  • noteId - 1651419262286811138
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8487591E4463E8B3C6534E72CFE0A65EF3CB7E3D44909BE7BC836654952C5C3B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1682564008672
  • tweetId - 1651326093016588291
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The claim that "Not 1 CMA appeal has been successful" is false. One example of a successful appeal against the CMA is the case of Flynn Pharma Ltd and Pfizer V Competition and Markets Authority https://www.supremecourt.uk/press-summary/uksc-2020-0113.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-27 02:53:28 UTC
(1682564008672)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-27 04:23:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 04:36:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 03:42:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 04:23:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 04:36:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-27 03:42:12 -0500 Rating Details