Birdwatch Note
2023-04-23 20:03:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Constitution's First Amendment protects the rights of all individuals, including atheists, to practice or not practice religion. US Supreme Court cases like Torcaso v. Watkins and Smith v. Employment Division have affirmed the rights of atheists under the Constitution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torcaso_v._Watkins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Division_v._Smith
Written by C0659F77575A1A4C2A34536F13584EF1014803AE706DAD87187E8966C8908536
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1650153460615073792
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1650228813379297287
- noteId - 1650228813379297287
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C0659F77575A1A4C2A34536F13584EF1014803AE706DAD87187E8966C8908536 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1682280183537
- tweetId - 1650153460615073792
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Constitution's First Amendment protects the rights of all individuals, including atheists, to practice or not practice religion. US Supreme Court cases like Torcaso v. Watkins and Smith v. Employment Division have affirmed the rights of atheists under the Constitution. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torcaso_v._Watkins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_Division_v._Smith
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-04-23 20:03:03 UTC (1682280183537) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC (1683340944665) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-04-23 23:43:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 15:47:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 15:12:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 15:41:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 23:43:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 15:47:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 15:12:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-23 15:41:50 -0500 | Rating Details |