Birdwatch Note
2023-04-23 14:30:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is not how the conclusion was reached. The study was a review, which determined that masking caused CO2 levels of 1.4 – 3.2%, in comparison to a US Navy recommendation that submarines with female crew must have CO2 < 0.8% based on animal studies showing fewer stillbirths. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(23)01324-5.pdf
Written by 79EE9127819E9192EB98246051A2D18348D13917D5CB443554F125CA4422DC95
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1650112013647982592
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1650145044039446529
- noteId - 1650145044039446529
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 79EE9127819E9192EB98246051A2D18348D13917D5CB443554F125CA4422DC95 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1682260211367
- tweetId - 1650112013647982592
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is not how the conclusion was reached. The study was a review, which determined that masking caused CO2 levels of 1.4 – 3.2%, in comparison to a US Navy recommendation that submarines with female crew must have CO2 < 0.8% based on animal studies showing fewer stillbirths. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/pdf/S2405-8440(23)01324-5.pdf
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-04-23 14:30:11 UTC (1682260211367) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC (1683340944665) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-04-23 10:07:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 10:06:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 16:20:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 10:02:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 12:10:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 09:41:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 09:30:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 13:00:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 10:34:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 10:07:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 10:06:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 16:20:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 10:02:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 12:10:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 09:41:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 09:30:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 13:00:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-23 10:34:45 -0500 | Rating Details |