Birdwatch Note
2023-04-21 19:07:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Note not needed. The author of the tweet asked a question which is answered in the replies section of the Tweet. https://twitter.com/lasciate/status/1649413114855653379
Written by DB3317FC2D8E0DA023B75C11ED6BE70ED2F19A3894D971E428BE9BE550B69510
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1649363056558845952
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1649489934691057664
- noteId - 1649489934691057664
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DB3317FC2D8E0DA023B75C11ED6BE70ED2F19A3894D971E428BE9BE550B69510 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1682104021129
- tweetId - 1649363056558845952
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Note not needed. The author of the tweet asked a question which is answered in the replies section of the Tweet. https://twitter.com/lasciate/status/1649413114855653379
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-04-21 14:09:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-21 14:31:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-21 14:09:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-21 14:31:24 -0500 | Rating Details |