Birdwatch Note
2023-04-21 02:29:44 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The counterclaim is on an active civil rights case in federal court (not state) & was filed as stated in the tweet. Proposed note is incorrect & irrelevant. Court document including the counterclaim: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wied.96666/gov.uscourts.wied.96666.35.0.pdf CourtListener page with most case documents available for free download: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60648929/grosskreutz-v-city-of-kenosha/
Written by 53898DB17ECDDB8648EEF935CB6A549F98569E6619DAFF240C313863886015F6
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1647027422364319744
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1649238961762586625
- noteId - 1649238961762586625
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 53898DB17ECDDB8648EEF935CB6A549F98569E6619DAFF240C313863886015F6 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1682044184520
- tweetId - 1647027422364319744
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The counterclaim is on an active civil rights case in federal court (not state) & was filed as stated in the tweet. Proposed note is incorrect & irrelevant. Court document including the counterclaim: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.wied.96666/gov.uscourts.wied.96666.35.0.pdf CourtListener page with most case documents available for free download: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60648929/grosskreutz-v-city-of-kenosha/
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-04-20 22:11:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:52:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:35:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-21 01:56:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-21 01:50:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:46:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 22:29:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:44:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:45:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:33:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 22:16:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:34:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:33:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 22:39:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:37:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 22:11:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:52:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:35:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-21 01:56:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-21 01:50:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:46:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 22:29:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:44:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:45:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:33:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 22:16:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:34:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:33:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 22:39:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-20 21:37:34 -0500 | Rating Details |