Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-20 11:44:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

There are two claims here. First, yes, this is the same rule used in the Hunter Biden situation. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html It doesn't matter if the two situations are in any way comparable other than that; it is the same rule. The second claim is sarcastic/hyperbolic. It's not actually a 1A issue.

Written by 71A49EE665957BB16D06E6E5008DA7ECF77E9835F05402A54A630965DD88545E
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1649016062430642177
• noteId - 1649016062430642177
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 71A49EE665957BB16D06E6E5008DA7ECF77E9835F05402A54A630965DD88545E Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1681991041177
• tweetId - 1648794388716216321
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• There are two claims here. First, yes, this is the same rule used in the Hunter Biden situation. https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2021/09/15/twitter-acted-lawfully-in-restricting-nypost-hunter-biden-article-fec.html It doesn't matter if the two situations are in any way comparable other than that; it is the same rule. The second claim is sarcastic/hyperbolic. It's not actually a 1A issue.