Birdwatch Note
2023-04-19 14:23:05 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
It's true that Twitter labeled CBC's official account "69% Government-funded Media." That number was not seemingly based on the factual makeup of CBC's budget. When Snopes asked why Twitter picked "69%," its communications team responded with a poop emoji autoreply. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cbc-69-twitter/
Written by 4861BD177CB9F94CD687D59EAAAE411FC994C55D6E2DAF5EC661036A618183D5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1648130881389748225
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1648693706881396738
- noteId - 1648693706881396738
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4861BD177CB9F94CD687D59EAAAE411FC994C55D6E2DAF5EC661036A618183D5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1681914185625
- tweetId - 1648130881389748225
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- It's true that Twitter labeled CBC's official account "69% Government-funded Media." That number was not seemingly based on the factual makeup of CBC's budget. When Snopes asked why Twitter picked "69%," its communications team responded with a poop emoji autoreply. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/cbc-69-twitter/
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-05-02 08:44:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-09 13:13:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 12:47:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 13:00:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 11:07:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 13:14:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 11:36:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 09:31:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 11:09:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 10:04:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 13:32:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 17:05:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 18:39:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 09:54:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 12:13:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 09:25:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 10:13:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 09:47:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 10:18:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 11:55:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-02 08:44:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 12:47:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 13:00:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 11:07:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 13:14:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 11:36:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 09:31:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 11:09:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 10:04:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 13:32:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 17:05:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 18:39:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 09:54:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 12:13:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 09:25:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 10:13:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-09 13:13:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 09:47:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 10:18:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-19 11:55:30 -0500 | Rating Details |