Birdwatch Note
2023-04-15 07:55:40 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The article is an opinion piece that provides no evidence to support its claims which are counterfactual.
Written by 467731AFD6A3E12253D043DB0756C75634D868D6E0852EAF0B04F71404CB589D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1646811538404126720
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1647146656884838401
- noteId - 1647146656884838401
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 467731AFD6A3E12253D043DB0756C75634D868D6E0852EAF0B04F71404CB589D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1681545340162
- tweetId - 1646811538404126720
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The article is an opinion piece that provides no evidence to support its claims which are counterfactual.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-04-15 03:58:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-15 03:58:16 -0500 | Rating Details |