Birdwatch Note
2023-04-12 12:08:34 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Both accounts, both the author and the egypt origin story are valid theories. The author origin is more widely accepted, but this does not make this other theory factually untrue, only less accepted. I think where there is more than one possible answer it should be NNN. https://allthingsgolliwog.com.au/golliwog-history/
Written by EE50726DD37EBB230077AEBACA78C2B835DFC91D979CFBBC5B8D8E711DD5E6F0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1645778485128953859
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1646123140102373377
- noteId - 1646123140102373377
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - EE50726DD37EBB230077AEBACA78C2B835DFC91D979CFBBC5B8D8E711DD5E6F0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1681301314746
- tweetId - 1645778485128953859
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Both accounts, both the author and the egypt origin story are valid theories. The author origin is more widely accepted, but this does not make this other theory factually untrue, only less accepted. I think where there is more than one possible answer it should be NNN. https://allthingsgolliwog.com.au/golliwog-history/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-04-12 12:08:34 UTC (1681301314746) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-04-14 02:10:59 UTC (1681438259334) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-04-12 17:32:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 16:47:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 15:46:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 14:17:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 14:10:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 12:45:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 11:47:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 10:27:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 10:26:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 09:23:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:59:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:45:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:35:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:27:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:24:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:16:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:13:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:45:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 12:45:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 11:47:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 14:17:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:24:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 10:27:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:35:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:27:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 16:47:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:16:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:13:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 14:10:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 07:59:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 15:46:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 10:26:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 17:32:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 09:23:50 -0500 | Rating Details |