Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-11 16:37:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Conflating furries and gender diverse/transgender people is a "slippery slope" logical fallacy.Furries is a fandom, a social fellowship — not a demographic group like the LGBTQ+ community. https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/01/30/how-furries-got-swept-up-in-anti-trans-litter-box-rumors/

Written by 4861BD177CB9F94CD687D59EAAAE411FC994C55D6E2DAF5EC661036A618183D5
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1645515138038939649

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1645828394783850502
  • noteId - 1645828394783850502
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4861BD177CB9F94CD687D59EAAAE411FC994C55D6E2DAF5EC661036A618183D5 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1681231041987
  • tweetId - 1645515138038939649
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Conflating furries and gender diverse/transgender people is a "slippery slope" logical fallacy.Furries is a fandom, a social fellowship — not a demographic group like the LGBTQ+ community. https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/01/30/how-furries-got-swept-up-in-anti-trans-litter-box-rumors/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-11 16:37:21 UTC
(1681231041987)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-04-12 04:41:01 UTC
(1681274461324)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-11 19:08:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 17:52:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 17:35:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 15:12:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 14:04:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 13:17:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:51:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:29:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:18:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:14:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:04:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-12 16:46:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-12 10:48:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 20:08:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-13 10:03:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 17:35:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:04:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:14:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 20:08:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 19:08:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:29:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-12 16:46:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-12 10:48:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 17:52:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 15:12:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:18:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 13:17:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-13 10:03:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 12:51:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-11 14:04:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-28 16:03:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-30 04:43:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 00:29:00 -0500 Rating Details