Birdwatch Note
2023-04-10 20:55:33 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Es un tweet que recoge las palabras textuales de una presentadora de televisión ante una polémica auspiciada por otro canal de televisión. Ejemplo del mismo estilo, misma presentadora en otro contexto: https://www.telecinco.es/elprogramadeanarosa/secciones/sociedad/20221010/ana-rosa-cancer-curada-seguir_18_07669210.html Por tanto, no es necesario revisar tweets que recogen palabras textuales.
Written by B8604F2F6E947AE96B4EBBEEA0086845F24D7CDC65DEB1FE9E594881EF943AE4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1645392265945153537
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1645530983469383681
- noteId - 1645530983469383681
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B8604F2F6E947AE96B4EBBEEA0086845F24D7CDC65DEB1FE9E594881EF943AE4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1681160133603
- tweetId - 1645392265945153537
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Es un tweet que recoge las palabras textuales de una presentadora de televisión ante una polémica auspiciada por otro canal de televisión. Ejemplo del mismo estilo, misma presentadora en otro contexto: https://www.telecinco.es/elprogramadeanarosa/secciones/sociedad/20221010/ana-rosa-cancer-curada-seguir_18_07669210.html Por tanto, no es necesario revisar tweets que recogen palabras textuales.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-04-10 20:55:33 UTC (1681160133603) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-04-11 03:40:53 UTC (1681184453338) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-04-10 16:33:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-10 16:22:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-10 16:21:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-10 16:18:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-11 10:51:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-11 06:29:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-11 00:23:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 06:21:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-10 16:18:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-12 06:21:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-11 06:29:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-11 00:23:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-11 10:51:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-10 16:33:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-10 16:21:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-10 16:22:54 -0500 | Rating Details |