Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-09 21:18:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Prosecutors are not capable of “rejecting” or “denying” motions. All motions have to be ruled upon by a judge. In this case, the judge will decide to grant or deny Tory Lanez’s motion for a new trial on April 10, 2023. What the prosecution has filed is an “opposition.” https://www.courts.ca.gov/partners/documents/insformot.pdf

Written by C88ECC9707AF6AD453EA239C3628EE288269FDFD9E7C7A15301E1000B4A02121
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1644828646518181888

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1645174283285725188
  • noteId - 1645174283285725188
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C88ECC9707AF6AD453EA239C3628EE288269FDFD9E7C7A15301E1000B4A02121 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1681075089653
  • tweetId - 1644828646518181888
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Prosecutors are not capable of “rejecting” or “denying” motions. All motions have to be ruled upon by a judge. In this case, the judge will decide to grant or deny Tory Lanez’s motion for a new trial on April 10, 2023. What the prosecution has filed is an “opposition.” https://www.courts.ca.gov/partners/documents/insformot.pdf

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-09 21:18:09 UTC
(1681075089653)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-04-11 03:40:53 UTC
(1681184453338)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-09 22:00:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 21:46:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 21:40:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 21:05:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 20:15:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 20:15:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 19:47:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 16:25:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 22:00:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 16:25:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 20:15:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 21:05:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 21:46:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 21:40:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 19:47:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-09 20:15:17 -0500 Rating Details