Birdwatch Note
2023-04-07 23:44:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The original clinical trials showed 95% prevention against infection. Randomized clinical trials testing vaccine efficacy would not test for transmission. Secondary observational trials were conducted on transmission. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abl4292 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2116597 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.14.21264959v1 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00127-7/fulltext
Written by 7554BE30DC1ACBA237371B5EFA9AFEE56A40F40178D64EB403F2D35E5AB5AD31
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1644188929317392388
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1644486328975802370
- noteId - 1644486328975802370
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7554BE30DC1ACBA237371B5EFA9AFEE56A40F40178D64EB403F2D35E5AB5AD31 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1680911068564
- tweetId - 1644188929317392388
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The original clinical trials showed 95% prevention against infection. Randomized clinical trials testing vaccine efficacy would not test for transmission. Secondary observational trials were conducted on transmission. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abl4292 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2116597 https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.14.21264959v1 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00127-7/fulltext
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-04-07 23:44:28 UTC (1680911068564) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-04-08 06:12:24 UTC (1680934344826) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-04-07 19:53:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-07 19:33:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-07 18:51:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-07 18:51:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-07 19:33:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-04-07 19:53:37 -0500 | Rating Details |