Birdwatch Note
2023-04-04 01:18:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The article @WallStreetSilv later cited contradicts his claim: "Taxpayers are not on the hook for the losses, if the FDIC is forced to pay. They come out of the FDIC’s $128 billion Deposit Insurance Fund, which is funded by all U.S. banks.." https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/why-the-fdic-offered-to-take-billions-in-losses-to-find-svb-assets-a-new-home-120903660.html Taxpayers did not bailout SVB https://abcnews.go.com/Business/bailout-federal-government-bailout-silicon-valley-bank-signature/story?id=97846142 https://www.npr.org/2023/03/13/1163180140/silicon-valley-bank-is-it-a-bailout-barofsky https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/13/wall-street-not-taxpayers-will-pay-for-the-svb-and-signature-deposit-relief-plans-.html
Written by FC320BF64AA7226AA1D26A5EEE368E0083F33B37766FF7ABD0FBCA67D1085ED5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1643023500272173060
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1643060354795053056
- noteId - 1643060354795053056
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FC320BF64AA7226AA1D26A5EEE368E0083F33B37766FF7ABD0FBCA67D1085ED5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1680571089825
- tweetId - 1643023500272173060
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The article @WallStreetSilv later cited contradicts his claim: "Taxpayers are not on the hook for the losses, if the FDIC is forced to pay. They come out of the FDIC’s $128 billion Deposit Insurance Fund, which is funded by all U.S. banks.." https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/why-the-fdic-offered-to-take-billions-in-losses-to-find-svb-assets-a-new-home-120903660.html Taxpayers did not bailout SVB https://abcnews.go.com/Business/bailout-federal-government-bailout-silicon-valley-bank-signature/story?id=97846142 https://www.npr.org/2023/03/13/1163180140/silicon-valley-bank-is-it-a-bailout-barofsky https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/13/wall-street-not-taxpayers-will-pay-for-the-svb-and-signature-deposit-relief-plans-.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-04-04 01:18:09 UTC (1680571089825) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-04-06 03:39:21 UTC (1680752361802) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-04-04 02:31:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 22:25:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 20:49:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 20:49:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 20:49:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 22:25:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 20:49:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-04 02:31:13 -0500 | Rating Details |