Birdwatch Note
2023-04-03 18:57:25 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Tweet is misleading and proposed note is helpful. Adding this to point out that the commenter spamming these tweets with the c19ivm.org link is spreading anti-vax propaganda; that site biases its data by including unreviewed and even retracted studies, and is highly unreliable. https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/ivermectin-hasnt-proven-effective-covid-19-so-far-despite-persistent-online-claims/
Written by 45060ED935D102E05C21C743FE433C0B17B27D8FCF69CED01A2AD3F9AB2815B1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1642802159111512064
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1642964538587860992
- noteId - 1642964538587860992
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 45060ED935D102E05C21C743FE433C0B17B27D8FCF69CED01A2AD3F9AB2815B1 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1680548245462
- tweetId - 1642802159111512064
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Tweet is misleading and proposed note is helpful. Adding this to point out that the commenter spamming these tweets with the c19ivm.org link is spreading anti-vax propaganda; that site biases its data by including unreviewed and even retracted studies, and is highly unreliable. https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/ivermectin-hasnt-proven-effective-covid-19-so-far-despite-persistent-online-claims/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-04-03 18:57:25 UTC (1680548245462) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-04-04 02:08:15 UTC (1680574095414) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-04-03 19:41:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 19:26:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 16:33:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 16:18:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 15:19:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 15:07:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 14:27:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 14:25:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 14:12:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 14:00:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-09 17:04:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 14:25:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 15:07:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 19:41:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 14:12:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 15:19:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 14:27:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-09 17:04:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 19:26:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 16:18:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 16:33:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-04-03 14:00:51 -0500 | Rating Details |