Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-03 01:36:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Tweet claims to be breaking news and utilises an unnamed source for purposes of confidentiality, like legacy media outlets use on a regular basis. https://www.voanews.com/a/journalists-use-anonymous-sources/3738986.html Current context note cites lack of evidence as "evidence" it did not occur which is a logical fallacy. NNN

Written by 3C653245A79535915563885BCB4967CB13C14B7921C3D51A59EE8C3D9C48D5F1
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1640031837916631042

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1642702608736436225
  • noteId - 1642702608736436225
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 3C653245A79535915563885BCB4967CB13C14B7921C3D51A59EE8C3D9C48D5F1 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1680485796519
  • tweetId - 1640031837916631042
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Tweet claims to be breaking news and utilises an unnamed source for purposes of confidentiality, like legacy media outlets use on a regular basis. https://www.voanews.com/a/journalists-use-anonymous-sources/3738986.html Current context note cites lack of evidence as "evidence" it did not occur which is a logical fallacy. NNN

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-03 01:36:36 UTC
(1680485796519)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-04-04 02:08:15 UTC
(1680574095414)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-03 01:26:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 20:52:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 18:54:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 18:23:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 16:30:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-04 19:47:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-03 11:36:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 22:06:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 21:20:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 21:14:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 21:13:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 21:04:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:56:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:53:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:32:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:11:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:11:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-06 21:48:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-08 04:52:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 16:30:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:53:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:32:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-03 01:26:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:56:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 21:14:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 21:13:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 22:06:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-06 21:48:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-04 19:47:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 21:20:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 18:23:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 18:54:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 21:04:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:11:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-08 04:52:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-05 20:11:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-03 11:36:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 20:52:44 -0500 Rating Details