Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-01 15:46:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

We have to acknowledge there is a viscious loop when those producing the vaccines are also those declaring them to be safe amidst VAERS and, increasingly sizeable, anecodotal evidence showing a different story. Just repeating the official boilerplate makes us look complicit. https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p725?s=09

Written by E6B7B3F231DB222CE243657FE0AC79426AC221AF7CBB932BCF66630F7B7DD1C7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1641939084074446849

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1642191596866117640
  • noteId - 1642191596866117640
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E6B7B3F231DB222CE243657FE0AC79426AC221AF7CBB932BCF66630F7B7DD1C7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1680363961794
  • tweetId - 1641939084074446849
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • We have to acknowledge there is a viscious loop when those producing the vaccines are also those declaring them to be safe amidst VAERS and, increasingly sizeable, anecodotal evidence showing a different story. Just repeating the official boilerplate makes us look complicit. https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj.p725?s=09

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-01 15:46:01 UTC
(1680363961794)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-04-02 02:40:17 UTC
(1680403217809)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-01 16:18:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-01 14:48:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-01 14:32:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-01 14:27:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-01 14:32:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-01 14:48:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-01 16:18:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-01 14:27:51 -0500 Rating Details