Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-31 20:40:22 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

"Act in Good Faith" If people volunteering their time to assess tweets had to address every stupid opinion people tweet it would be exhausting and pointless. And using notes to "pile on" more ridiculous opinions is a misuse of the enterprise. NNN https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

Written by D6E02FC90F5D3E0307F50EEFBA8E522C5B7075FEC7BC45FF8D869F74D988740F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1641705635698950144

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1641903284150755332
  • noteId - 1641903284150755332
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - D6E02FC90F5D3E0307F50EEFBA8E522C5B7075FEC7BC45FF8D869F74D988740F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1680295222688
  • tweetId - 1641705635698950144
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • "Act in Good Faith" If people volunteering their time to assess tweets had to address every stupid opinion people tweet it would be exhausting and pointless. And using notes to "pile on" more ridiculous opinions is a misuse of the enterprise. NNN https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-31 20:40:22 UTC
(1680295222688)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-04-01 02:38:32 UTC
(1680316712512)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-31 17:16:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:42:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:30:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:24:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:17:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:15:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 15:42:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 23:17:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:15:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:42:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 23:17:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 15:42:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:24:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:17:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 17:16:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-31 16:30:27 -0500 Rating Details