Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-26 03:08:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

O Banco mencionado é o PagSeguro. Entretanto, bancos com mais ativos aplicados do que captados sofrem prejuízo com altas taxas de juros. Não há fonte que afirme que a Folha de SP ganhe com os juros altos Para mais informações, consultar o livro Mercado Financeiro, Assaf Neto

Written by 8F781B71418DA21F05E2C9AFD8FC4D56B67AB4A07E3D77246679CACF65F32843
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1639770513298866176

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1639826589084008448
  • noteId - 1639826589084008448
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8F781B71418DA21F05E2C9AFD8FC4D56B67AB4A07E3D77246679CACF65F32843 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1679800100001
  • tweetId - 1639770513298866176
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • O Banco mencionado é o PagSeguro. Entretanto, bancos com mais ativos aplicados do que captados sofrem prejuízo com altas taxas de juros. Não há fonte que afirme que a Folha de SP ganhe com os juros altos Para mais informações, consultar o livro Mercado Financeiro, Assaf Neto

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-26 03:08:20 UTC
(1679800100001)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-03-27 02:38:48 UTC
(1679884728338)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-26 10:24:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 09:13:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 09:00:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 08:56:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 08:47:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 07:33:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 06:57:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 06:49:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 06:06:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 05:20:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 00:05:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-25 23:41:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-25 22:28:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 18:09:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 13:49:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 12:52:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 12:03:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 11:52:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 10:30:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 09:13:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 08:56:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 12:52:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 18:09:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-25 23:41:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 06:06:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 06:49:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 00:05:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 08:47:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 05:20:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 07:33:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 10:24:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 06:57:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-25 22:28:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 11:52:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 12:03:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 09:00:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 10:30:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-26 13:49:59 -0500 Rating Details