Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-25 19:59:51 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The tweet is expressing an opinion. The full context may sway public opinion, but a court of law determines what evidence is admissible based on specific charges that are brought. The prior harassment may be totally irrelevant based on self defense laws in this jurisdiction.

Written by 873F3C7468C0790B61E29ECBA910F835731B69126F882CF1F21456FC66F41E7B
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1639718758540345345
• noteId - 1639718758540345345
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 873F3C7468C0790B61E29ECBA910F835731B69126F882CF1F21456FC66F41E7B Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1679774391196
• tweetId - 1639479705312301056
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• The tweet is expressing an opinion. The full context may sway public opinion, but a court of law determines what evidence is admissible based on specific charges that are brought. The prior harassment may be totally irrelevant based on self defense laws in this jurisdiction.