Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-23 08:18:24 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This tweet is misleading because the implication is that Pierre Poiliviere is not interested in an inquiry into this. However, Justin Trudeau, Pierre Poiliviere, and Jahmeet Singh all want an inquiry. Not necessarily a public one because of national security. https://globalnews.ca/news/9530085/china-foreign-interference-public-inquiry-poilievre-singh/ https://www.thestar.com/politics/2023/03/07/opposition-continues-to-push-for-public-inquiry-into-foreign-interference.html https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/will-the-conservative-foreign-interference-motion-be-a-confidence-vote-liberals-having-ongoing-discussions-1.6320328

Written by 4B17FFAA00CF2918BF17001238225FDC8CCB8EBCF1720CDC9EE921C60291815E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1638566010956681216

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1638817459804471296
  • noteId - 1638817459804471296
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 4B17FFAA00CF2918BF17001238225FDC8CCB8EBCF1720CDC9EE921C60291815E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1679559504830
  • tweetId - 1638566010956681216
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This tweet is misleading because the implication is that Pierre Poiliviere is not interested in an inquiry into this. However, Justin Trudeau, Pierre Poiliviere, and Jahmeet Singh all want an inquiry. Not necessarily a public one because of national security. https://globalnews.ca/news/9530085/china-foreign-interference-public-inquiry-poilievre-singh/ https://www.thestar.com/politics/2023/03/07/opposition-continues-to-push-for-public-inquiry-into-foreign-interference.html https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/will-the-conservative-foreign-interference-motion-be-a-confidence-vote-liberals-having-ongoing-discussions-1.6320328

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-23 08:18:24 UTC
(1679559504830)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-24 02:40:31 UTC
(1679625631780)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-23 18:48:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 15:57:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 14:35:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 14:23:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 13:10:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 12:24:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 12:02:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 11:23:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 08:16:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 07:49:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 06:23:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 05:18:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 03:32:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 13:10:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 15:57:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 11:23:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 12:24:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 18:48:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 14:23:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 03:32:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 06:23:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 08:16:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 14:35:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 05:18:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 12:02:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-23 07:49:17 -0500 Rating Details