Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-23 00:08:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The DoJ Justice Manual, Title 9-11.233, citing the US Supreme Court decision in US v. Williams (1992) would indicate that, while a violation of DoJ policy, it isn't a legal requirement to introduce "substantial exculpatory evidence" to a grand jury. https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-11000-grand-jury#9-11.233 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/504/36/

Written by D1AD78A534180E000E161C1FB712DE5182FCFB42BE03F5179E2B0D42533E10BC
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1638694166715678722
• noteId - 1638694166715678722
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - D1AD78A534180E000E161C1FB712DE5182FCFB42BE03F5179E2B0D42533E10BC Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1679530109473
• tweetId - 1638601993307529216
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The DoJ Justice Manual, Title 9-11.233, citing the US Supreme Court decision in US v. Williams (1992) would indicate that, while a violation of DoJ policy, it isn't a legal requirement to introduce "substantial exculpatory evidence" to a grand jury. https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-11000-grand-jury#9-11.233 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/504/36/