Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-20 21:07:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The cited study clearly states that they did not examine toxicity in non-viable fetuses, which is what this tweet is about - the possibility of survivorship bias. So citing the study’s results for viable fetuses is irrelevant - no note needed https://twitter.com/jikkyleaks/status/1637273656480129024

Written by 863DD88670B1DD24E7EEFD3795300708A46E66FE0003E0C9DED3541E4EFF4801
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1637785627079979010

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1637923779790929920
  • noteId - 1637923779790929920
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 863DD88670B1DD24E7EEFD3795300708A46E66FE0003E0C9DED3541E4EFF4801 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1679346434912
  • tweetId - 1637785627079979010
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The cited study clearly states that they did not examine toxicity in non-viable fetuses, which is what this tweet is about - the possibility of survivorship bias. So citing the study’s results for viable fetuses is irrelevant - no note needed https://twitter.com/jikkyleaks/status/1637273656480129024

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-20 21:07:14 UTC
(1679346434912)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-21 03:09:46 UTC
(1679368186219)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-20 19:27:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 16:51:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 16:39:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-21 00:38:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 22:56:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 16:45:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 16:45:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 22:56:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 19:27:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 16:39:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-21 00:38:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 16:51:40 -0500 Rating Details