Birdwatch Note
2023-03-20 18:35:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There is no evidence of an increase in DNA in mRNA vaccines. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf Furthermore, the specific "study" is a non-peer-reviewed blog post that has been heavily criticized by other experts for not using standard methods or controlling for contamination. https://twitter.com/Debunk_the_Funk/status/1637880292076560386
Written by B289B7B9A72A2B21A5016714B5CFECC892B67D4EF528AD49D229201250F7B83A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1637133867319451649
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1637885595228971009
- noteId - 1637885595228971009
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B289B7B9A72A2B21A5016714B5CFECC892B67D4EF528AD49D229201250F7B83A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1679337331003
- tweetId - 1637133867319451649
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There is no evidence of an increase in DNA in mRNA vaccines. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf Furthermore, the specific "study" is a non-peer-reviewed blog post that has been heavily criticized by other experts for not using standard methods or controlling for contamination. https://twitter.com/Debunk_the_Funk/status/1637880292076560386
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-03-20 18:35:31 UTC (1679337331003) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-03-21 03:09:46 UTC (1679368186219) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-03-20 15:00:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:42:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:39:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:17:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:15:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 16:29:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 16:08:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 16:02:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 01:42:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 16:07:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:39:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:42:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 16:07:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:15:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 16:08:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 01:42:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 16:29:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 16:02:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:17:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 15:00:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-11 05:04:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-11 04:45:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-11 02:51:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-11 02:26:39 -0500 | Rating Details |