Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-20 14:05:25 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Trump did not sue Daniels, Daniels sued Trump. The rest of the tweet is accurate as Daniels lost her appeal and was ordered to pay the President $300,000 in damages. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/stormy-daniels-must-pay-300k-donald-trump-losing-defamation-case-appea-rcna21002

Written by 97BA278ED28250BF11103CB9464DDB39E1949B2726B6989F32E5487DCB66586D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1637655048565014528

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1637817626133970944
  • noteId - 1637817626133970944
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 97BA278ED28250BF11103CB9464DDB39E1949B2726B6989F32E5487DCB66586D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1679321125906
  • tweetId - 1637655048565014528
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Trump did not sue Daniels, Daniels sued Trump. The rest of the tweet is accurate as Daniels lost her appeal and was ordered to pay the President $300,000 in damages. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/stormy-daniels-must-pay-300k-donald-trump-losing-defamation-case-appea-rcna21002

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-20 14:05:25 UTC
(1679321125906)
2023-03-20 18:09:58 UTC
(1679335798877)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-03-21 03:09:46 UTC
(1679368186219)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL 2023-03-20 18:09:58 UTC
(1679335798877)
CURRENTLY_RATED_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-20 14:43:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 14:35:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 13:22:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 13:07:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 12:21:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 11:38:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 11:29:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 11:03:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 10:39:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 10:21:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 10:06:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 09:59:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 09:56:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 09:12:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 09:09:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 14:43:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 11:03:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 10:39:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 12:21:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 09:12:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 11:38:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 09:59:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 14:35:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 11:29:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 13:07:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 10:06:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 09:09:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 10:21:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 09:56:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-20 13:22:58 -0500 Rating Details