Birdwatch Note
2023-03-19 16:02:22 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Retweet suggests that Kim Dotcom’s post of France riots cheers violent protests in Paris, but Kim Dotcom’s post does not make a comment cheering the Paris protests. It seems to imply the opposite: A warning that protests like the one in Paris may spread. https://twitter.com/kimdotcom/status/1636981641632690176?s=46&t=NeN8kdnX5O2tJXRDABn0WA
Written by C4C5E7F5F490894ECA0CCCF6AE608BA3D6F824CF020A1BF8F4E8B1C336BDE788
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1637450496335069185
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1637484668491644929
- noteId - 1637484668491644929
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C4C5E7F5F490894ECA0CCCF6AE608BA3D6F824CF020A1BF8F4E8B1C336BDE788 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1679241742621
- tweetId - 1637450496335069185
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Retweet suggests that Kim Dotcom’s post of France riots cheers violent protests in Paris, but Kim Dotcom’s post does not make a comment cheering the Paris protests. It seems to imply the opposite: A warning that protests like the one in Paris may spread. https://twitter.com/kimdotcom/status/1636981641632690176?s=46&t=NeN8kdnX5O2tJXRDABn0WA
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-03-19 16:02:22 UTC (1679241742621) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-03-20 03:10:48 UTC (1679281848093) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-03-19 14:31:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 13:26:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 12:42:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 12:15:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 12:03:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:59:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:26:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:22:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:15:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:06:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:22:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 12:15:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 13:26:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:15:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:26:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:59:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 14:31:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 12:03:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 12:42:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-19 11:06:40 -0500 | Rating Details |