Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-17 09:30:21 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer did not, in fact, reject a request for assistance, nor did they have the authority to do so. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jun/13/sean-hannity/no-evidence-pelosi-rejected-trumps-authorization-2/

Written by 622DCF2DE98CF56BAD09A65211132962D76125249ED6936BE43C6824EFC2C1B2
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1633200340945317889

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1636661237227597824
  • noteId - 1636661237227597824
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 622DCF2DE98CF56BAD09A65211132962D76125249ED6936BE43C6824EFC2C1B2 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1679045421307
  • tweetId - 1633200340945317889
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer did not, in fact, reject a request for assistance, nor did they have the authority to do so. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/jun/13/sean-hannity/no-evidence-pelosi-rejected-trumps-authorization-2/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-17 09:30:21 UTC
(1679045421307)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-19 03:09:38 UTC
(1679195378458)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-17 18:58:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 15:44:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 14:47:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 13:02:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 12:59:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 12:05:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 12:03:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 11:51:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 11:43:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 11:22:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 08:12:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 07:50:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 06:58:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 05:36:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-19 00:24:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 12:03:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-19 00:24:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 13:02:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 11:22:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 18:58:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 06:58:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 12:05:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 14:47:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 11:51:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 07:50:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 08:12:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 11:43:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 15:44:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 05:36:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 12:59:14 -0500 Rating Details
2024-01-06 21:42:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-06 21:16:36 -0600 Rating Details