Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-15 06:09:37 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Tweet is a question regarding the linked data inviting users to review it themselves and come to their own conclusions. The interpretation of the data by the user is an opinion and by nature subjective. Comments should be posted as replies. No note needed. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

Written by 72B377667CE7FAC1106C7F93CD4827821915A97F3D9E186F11BF76BB5844BB3E
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1635480017756127233

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1635885947576254464
  • noteId - 1635885947576254464
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 72B377667CE7FAC1106C7F93CD4827821915A97F3D9E186F11BF76BB5844BB3E Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1678860577850
  • tweetId - 1635480017756127233
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Tweet is a question regarding the linked data inviting users to review it themselves and come to their own conclusions. The interpretation of the data by the user is an opinion and by nature subjective. Comments should be posted as replies. No note needed. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-15 06:09:37 UTC
(1678860577850)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-03-16 03:10:18 UTC
(1678936218691)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-15 09:38:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 09:03:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 08:30:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 01:37:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 01:21:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 01:17:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 01:14:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 08:30:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 09:38:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 01:37:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 01:17:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 01:14:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 01:21:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-15 09:03:55 -0500 Rating Details