Birdwatch Note
2023-03-14 18:51:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
While they use the ambiguous term, “narcotic,” without any clarification (or proof), they imply this was an opioid overdose by saying they needed Narcan. It is not possible to overdose on any opioids from secondhand exposure or casual contact. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-fentanyl-overdose-idUSL1N2PI0PZ
Written by E869CB2545D16F80E5773496CEA2319FF0243270B87C39610F3D5BD892C67EE0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1634779208806281218
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1635715356860743711
- noteId - 1635715356860743711
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E869CB2545D16F80E5773496CEA2319FF0243270B87C39610F3D5BD892C67EE0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1678819905856
- tweetId - 1634779208806281218
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- While they use the ambiguous term, “narcotic,” without any clarification (or proof), they imply this was an opioid overdose by saying they needed Narcan. It is not possible to overdose on any opioids from secondhand exposure or casual contact. https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-fentanyl-overdose-idUSL1N2PI0PZ
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-03-14 18:51:45 UTC (1678819905856) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-03-15 05:09:59 UTC (1678856999448) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-03-14 21:43:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 21:27:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 21:21:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 20:56:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 20:52:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 20:48:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 20:05:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 15:44:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 14:31:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 13:59:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 13:26:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 11:41:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 11:35:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 09:08:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 09:00:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 09:00:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 20:56:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 21:27:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 20:52:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 11:35:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 21:21:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 13:59:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 15:44:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 09:08:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 21:43:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 14:31:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 11:41:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-15 13:26:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 20:48:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-14 20:05:37 -0500 | Rating Details |