Birdwatch Note
2023-03-14 12:54:11 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Claims of predicting earthquakes have no basis in scientific fact. Scientists say it is possible to use data to estimate the probability of earthquakes in areas where they are known to occur, but no one has been able to make a credible prediction so far. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/can-you-predict-an-earthquake/
Written by 4861BD177CB9F94CD687D59EAAAE411FC994C55D6E2DAF5EC661036A618183D5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1635560643066576899
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1635625372808015872
- noteId - 1635625372808015872
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4861BD177CB9F94CD687D59EAAAE411FC994C55D6E2DAF5EC661036A618183D5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1678798451984
- tweetId - 1635560643066576899
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Claims of predicting earthquakes have no basis in scientific fact. Scientists say it is possible to use data to estimate the probability of earthquakes in areas where they are known to occur, but no one has been able to make a credible prediction so far. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/can-you-predict-an-earthquake/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-03-14 12:54:11 UTC (1678798451984) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-03-15 05:09:59 UTC (1678856999448) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-03-14 13:50:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:28:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:13:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:28:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:18:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:11:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 11:42:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 10:45:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 10:05:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:27:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:24:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:18:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:06:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-15 16:41:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-20 03:15:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:28:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:24:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:27:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:50:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:06:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 08:18:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:18:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 10:05:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 10:45:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:28:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 12:11:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 11:42:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-20 03:15:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-14 13:13:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-03-15 16:41:12 -0500 | Rating Details |