Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-07-15 15:22:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D591D87CD1F417F82D58A15B80F75C593B6E0DE75817208FDEEBF422AD65AB21
Participant Details

Original Note:

At no point in time in the history of autopen being used in the United States by multiple former presidents, has it been deemed forgery or illegal. In fact, no challenges to autopen have ever surmounted to criminal malfeasance, or led to the overturning of signatures. https://surface.syr.edu/lawpub/83/#:~:text=This%20was%20the%20rock%2Dsolid,the%20President's%20presence%20is%20unconstitutional. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/28/us/politics/28sign.html#:~:text=This%20week%2C%20the%20White%20House,president's%20signature%20to%20the%20bill.%E2%80%9D

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1944858965579587700
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D591D87CD1F417F82D58A15B80F75C593B6E0DE75817208FDEEBF422AD65AB21
  • createdAtMillis - 1752592973197
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1944858965579587700D591D87CD1F417F82D58A15B80F75C593B6E0DE75817208FDEEBF422AD65AB21