Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-07-14 22:58:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52CB6EDF5FFB35B401F3A3D1DAB796E41F508A4C80E9A546C0F01C6B3D5E8E3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

At no point in time in the history of autopen being used in the United States by multiple former presidents, has it been deemed forgery or illegal. In fact, no challenges to autopen have ever surmounted to criminal malfeasance, or led to the overturning of signatures. https://surface.syr.edu/lawpub/83/#:~:text=This%20was%20the%20rock%2Dsolid,the%20President's%20presence%20is%20unconstitutional. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/28/us/politics/28sign.html#:~:text=This%20week%2C%20the%20White%20House,president's%20signature%20to%20the%20bill.%E2%80%9D

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1944858965579587700
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52CB6EDF5FFB35B401F3A3D1DAB796E41F508A4C80E9A546C0F01C6B3D5E8E3E
  • createdAtMillis - 1752533929951
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 194485896557958770052CB6EDF5FFB35B401F3A3D1DAB796E41F508A4C80E9A546C0F01C6B3D5E8E3E