Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-07-12 15:34:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3DCCA8763574316CEBE33CFD99912AD32F04CCE68F36AC70C7FABCE5848D3078
Participant Details

Original Note:

Las defensas de Cerdán y Ábalos manifestaron que las voces podrían haber sido generadas con IA. Los expertos rechazan tal hipótesis: "Por nuestra experiencia, todo apunta a que la voz es humana y las puntuaciones son inferiores debido a la baja SNR" https://theobjective.com/espana/tribunales/2025-07-12/pericial-audios-koldo-voz-cerdan/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1944018075172356173
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3DCCA8763574316CEBE33CFD99912AD32F04CCE68F36AC70C7FABCE5848D3078
  • createdAtMillis - 1752334468512
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19440180751723561733DCCA8763574316CEBE33CFD99912AD32F04CCE68F36AC70C7FABCE5848D3078