Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-12 00:51:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 258139C6885887CE8D13AA0D434B0527E477CD8412B8120A667C8BE4AB3A8282
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the video implies the DOJ brought the lawsuit in response to a drink name, which would be a violation of the 1st Amendment, the actual lawsuit is regarding two cases of alleged refusal of service to two Jewish patrons in 2024. https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/oakland-coffee-shop-civil-rights-lawsuit-20371005.php

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1932917129356927000
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 258139C6885887CE8D13AA0D434B0527E477CD8412B8120A667C8BE4AB3A8282
  • createdAtMillis - 1749689514530
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1932917129356927000258139C6885887CE8D13AA0D434B0527E477CD8412B8120A667C8BE4AB3A8282