Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-22 11:37:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D94FFA112871DA3D43029FD7CC62535579C7ADBC5BF26F403FCEC3E99FDC7A6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - opinion OP accurately quotes testimony, which isn't limited to discussing only strict causality. Proposed CN distorts the source by omitting the sentence immediately following the quote: "However, no other causes were identified by PCR assay or serologic examination." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2109975

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1925408047985311845
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6D94FFA112871DA3D43029FD7CC62535579C7ADBC5BF26F403FCEC3E99FDC7A6
  • createdAtMillis - 1747913849989
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19254080479853118456D94FFA112871DA3D43029FD7CC62535579C7ADBC5BF26F403FCEC3E99FDC7A6