Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 13:01:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A24A52C0F6A559CE25A8FB3B07A665341243F73628E71CF5B446FF304974909C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details