Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 01:20:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A0D87F30E9C3A4F20138A26CE9E2643730DA3361B5D2BB217903348DC75E9036
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details