Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 03:10:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 87421438B59F455D93844055BB4D476C75B1A526A83307DC70D089639AF33157
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details