Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 01:42:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 60C9373CE9E6A9D023D2ECBE7FB4ECCD66ADA7DE0350D1F0A1B895C6E5B0134C
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details