Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 17:32:10 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4CA3E6F2EE884335280A162FB6D90E940DD0A198C4BDB9248F1A4C6D5731C7CF
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details