Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-06 02:17:08 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1212B7690624AFC16F40F91E6C7EA04CA061F25A89EDADAF50B6693B04108984
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details