Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-05-07 03:53:04 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1136B93EAF50107CCCCAD6F562DE683183A538AE8C49B7BF4841ADB63E323AF2
Participant Details
Original Note:
Miller’s statement is false under binding precedent of SCOTUS. In Zadvydas v. Davis & Mathews V. Diaz the court held “Even one whose presence in this country is unlawful, involuntary, or transitory is entitled to that constitutional protection.” https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-5/removal-of-aliens-who-have-entered-the-united-states
All Note Details