Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-05 17:18:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B78DC1D41714DEB0CB2F8A124A2EC5BD37B9F397CC2A2353E5E77BC2334E6C3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

本文にて瀬戸内法についての記述がありますが、瀬戸内法はその対象を特定施設としており、夢洲の水そのものは対象外と考えるため、説明としては不適切です https://laws.e-gov.go.jp/law/348AC1000000110

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1919288789547302960
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B78DC1D41714DEB0CB2F8A124A2EC5BD37B9F397CC2A2353E5E77BC2334E6C3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1746465528974
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1919288789547302960B78DC1D41714DEB0CB2F8A124A2EC5BD37B9F397CC2A2353E5E77BC2334E6C3F