Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-16 21:08:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B8743330737E3C01AAF404DF693199C8F0A64CEF830E2810E06EE8C70E86C5CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, maybe. The majority of the data provided in the proposed note is 10 years old. Some of the data is 3 years old. It’s not current. Even if diagnostic criteria changed, that’s important and does not take away from the current facts presented by RFK.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912601474821157221
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B8743330737E3C01AAF404DF693199C8F0A64CEF830E2810E06EE8C70E86C5CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1744837729595
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1912601474821157221B8743330737E3C01AAF404DF693199C8F0A64CEF830E2810E06EE8C70E86C5CD