Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-08 06:34:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F030DB9DAA84CA7C4B7BECE537EDFCF18D6B435AB5E6398091DB1FBE7936C659
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, factually correct. The core factual claim ("judge in Washington, DC does not have the jurisdiction") is correct: "The detainees are confined in Texas, so venue is improper in the District of Columbia." The remaining parts of this post are personal opinions. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a931_2c83.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1909430975156621495
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F030DB9DAA84CA7C4B7BECE537EDFCF18D6B435AB5E6398091DB1FBE7936C659
  • createdAtMillis - 1744094049664
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1909430975156621495F030DB9DAA84CA7C4B7BECE537EDFCF18D6B435AB5E6398091DB1FBE7936C659