Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-25 20:50:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3D140B3C28D2D6411E399FBCD29FD36E3AA853F8BFC3A55F1894C0B87DA1EBA1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The "debunked by scientists" note is not even supported by the author's own link. The link article cites one guy's opinion on the quality of the study and no debunking information.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1904609910534344797
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3D140B3C28D2D6411E399FBCD29FD36E3AA853F8BFC3A55F1894C0B87DA1EBA1
  • createdAtMillis - 1742935822241
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19046099105343447973D140B3C28D2D6411E399FBCD29FD36E3AA853F8BFC3A55F1894C0B87DA1EBA1